Use the Prompt
Add Your Brief
Add your context below. It will be included with the prompt when you copy or download.
Create an editable mobile-first app prototype using the existing project stack for [PROJECT] and [AUDIENCE]. The task is: Neighborhood Repair Report.
Required content and structure
Draft a public-space repair report with a location, category and photo, review privacy-sensitive details and show a clearly simulated submission timeline.
Screens and navigation
Build three connected views: My reports; New report; Status timeline. Keep the selected record visible in the screen title or summary. Support an explicit back action and preserve in-progress inputs when moving between views. Keep the primary action near the relevant content and account for mobile safe areas, a visible software keyboard and long translated labels. At desktop widths, adapt the composition without removing a step or changing the task.
Project inputs
Use [APPROVED_CONTENT] for names, records, labels, quantities and destinations. Ask for missing data instead of inventing operational claims. Demonstration records may use the fictional brand Street Care; label these as sample data. Explain which actions are local prototype interactions and which would require authentication, persistence, permissions or a backend. Do not connect external services or claim a transaction was completed unless that integration has been explicitly implemented and tested.
Design direction
Follow [BRAND_RULES]. When no brand is supplied, use white, civic blue, muted green, readable service typography. Make the workflow recognizable through its own content and controls, rather than repeating generic dashboard cards. Use a consistent spacing scale and clear text hierarchy. Include visible keyboard focus, accessible names, sufficient contrast and non-color status labels. Respect reduced motion and keep animated transitions optional.
Task-specific acceptance check
- Keep a locally saved draft separate from an externally submitted report; do not claim a public agency has received it.
Interaction states
Implement the three-screen happy path with local sample data. Include a useful empty state, validation before completing an action, a loading or pending state and a recoverable failure state. Destructive changes require a review or undo path. Keep the state of a record consistent across all three views. Do not silently discard partially completed input or change a user's choice after a retry.
Delivery and review
Return the editable app views and explain the data model, any local storage behavior and unimplemented integrations. Test at 320px and a wider viewport, with keyboard navigation and long content. Use the task-specific acceptance check above to review the result before adding features. Keep demonstration behavior clearly distinct from a running production service.
Reference attachment and reconstruction goal
Attach reference.webp from this prompt’s download bundle alongside this prompt in OpenDesign. Build an editable result with a similar composition and hierarchy; do not embed the whole reference image as the finished interface. Preserve approved project content and brand rules if they conflict with fictional sample labels. If the image is missing or unreadable, ask for it instead of claiming visual fidelity.
Reference composition and content
Use the attached reference.webp as the visual reference for Neighborhood Repair Report. Before building, identify the major regions from top to bottom, their relative widths and heights, alignment, spacing, typography hierarchy, surface colors, borders, imagery and repeated components. Preserve those relationships rather than substituting a generic template. Required task content: Draft a public-space repair report with a location, category and photo, review privacy-sensitive details and show a clearly simulated submission timeline. Use the following task-specific layout guidance when translating the image into editable elements: Begin with My reports as the entry screen, give New report a clear primary action, and make Status timeline explain what happened and what can happen next. Use white, civic blue, muted green, readable service typography as a starting direction, adapting it to the supplied brand. Keep record identity and navigation context visible across the three screens. Prioritize thumb-accessible controls and readable labels over decorative panels; on wider screens, keep the workflow coherent rather than stretching a mobile composition edge to edge.
Visual direction from the example brief
white, civic blue, muted green, readable service typography.
Interaction specification
The reference is a static concept: the behavior below is a requirement to implement, not proof that the picture already works. Copy the customized prompt into your project and build the connected flow: Draft a public-space repair report with a location, category and photo, review privacy-sensitive details and show a clearly simulated submission timeline. Keep a locally saved draft separate from an externally submitted report; do not claim a public agency has received it. For each visible control, specify its trigger, affected state and feedback; implement local changes with consistent state across related views. Give search and filters real results, selection controls an explicit active state, and save actions visible pending/success/failure feedback where relevant. Do not add unrelated workflows. Use proper links for navigation, buttons for actions and accessible names for icon controls. Do not imply a backend operation succeeded when only a local demo changed.
Visual comparison and delivery
- Compare the result with the attached image at matching proportions. Review major region placement, relative image sizes, line breaks, spacing, typography hierarchy, contrast, active states and content density before polishing decorative details.
- Then test the narrow layout without squeezing desktop text into tiny labels.
- Keep logos, photos and icons as separate assets and all meaningful labels editable. List any unavailable fonts/assets and any intentional departures. Return the working files plus a concise account of implemented behavior and remaining integrations; do not promise a pixel-identical result from the prompt alone.
Download Prompt + Image
Includes the complete prompt and full-size reference image. Attach both in OpenDesign to guide the layout.
How to Write a Neighborhood Repair Report Design Prompt
Use this neighborhood repair report design prompt to draft a public-space repair report with a location, category and photo, review privacy-sensitive details and show a clearly simulated submission timeline.
The reference is an AI-generated concept. The instructions below describe what to build and test; the image does not demonstrate working behavior.
Make Submission Status Unambiguous
A neighborhood repair report app handles information someone may expect an agency to receive.
Draft, review and simulated submission need unmistakable boundaries. Begin with My reports as the entry screen, give New report a clear primary action, and make Status timeline explain what happened and what can happen next. Use white, civic blue, muted green, readable service typography as a starting direction, adapting it to the supplied brand. Keep record identity and navigation context visible across the three screens. Prioritize thumb-accessible controls and readable labels over decorative panels; on wider screens, keep the workflow coherent rather than stretching a mobile composition edge to edge.
From the Prompt
Build three connected views: My reports; New report; Status timeline.
Make It Your Own
Collect [LOCATION], category and photo, then review privacy-sensitive details. Label the timeline as simulated and keep local drafts separate from externally submitted reports.
Prepare the Neighborhood Repair Report Content
The form collects location before category, photograph and description; request validation and a saved-draft state for incomplete reports.
Supply fictional locations, issue categories and safe demonstration photos. Define the privacy review fields and the simulated timeline labels, including a locally saved draft that has never been sent to an agency.
From the Prompt
Draft a public-space repair report with a location, category and photo, review privacy-sensitive details and show a clearly simulated submission timeline.
Make It Your Own
For [PROJECT], use [APPROVED_CONTENT] as the source for this neighborhood repair report. Approved records and field labels for My reports; New report; Status timeline; the action and persistence rules; brand assets and permission requirements. Identify missing inputs before replacing them with demonstration content.
Save Without Submitting
The timeline explicitly separates app review from submission to an agency; preserve that distinction and never imply external delivery without integration.
The report should remain available as a draft without an agency-received status. The user should be able to remove sensitive details before any actual submission flow is introduced. Test this specific boundary first: Keep a locally saved draft separate from an externally submitted report; do not claim a public agency has received it. Then run the main flow with a long record title, no saved records and a failed action. A user should be able to tell what is saved, what is pending and what can be undone without relying on color. Verify that returning to the previous screen preserves entered data and that a screen reader encounters the title, status and primary action in a sensible order.
From the Prompt
Keep a locally saved draft separate from an externally submitted report; do not claim a public agency has received it.
Make It Your Own
Review the neighborhood repair report against this requirement: Keep a locally saved draft separate from an externally submitted report; do not claim a public agency has received it. Test this specific boundary first: Keep a locally saved draft separate from an externally submitted report; do not claim a public agency has received it. Then run the main flow with a long record title, no saved records and a failed action. A user should be able to tell what is saved, what is pending and what can be undone without relying on color. Verify that returning to the previous screen preserves entered data and that a screen reader encounters the title, status and primary action in a sensible order. Preserve approved content and revise only the parts that fail this check.
Review Your Neighborhood Repair Report Result
The example is an AI-generated visual concept. Connected services, device permissions and persistent data require separate implementation and testing.
- Keep a locally saved draft separate from an externally submitted report; do not claim a public agency has received it.
Follow-Up Prompt
Use this after the first result. It narrows the revision to the most important part of this task.
Refine only the New report to Status timeline transition. Keep a locally saved draft separate from an externally submitted report; do not claim a public agency has received it. Show the relevant pending, failure and completed states with explicit labels. Preserve the approved navigation, typography and other screens. Return the changed views and describe how entered data survives a retry.
