Use the Prompt
Add Your Brief
Add your context below. It will be included with the prompt when you copy or download.
Create an editable HTML/CSS composition with selectable text and a print stylesheet; treat any raster illustration as a separate local asset for [PROJECT] and [AUDIENCE]. The task is: Comparison Infographic.
Required content and structure
Compare two approaches against consistent criteria using matched visual emphasis.
Use [APPROVED_CONTENT] as the source of names, dates, figures, claims and destinations. List missing inputs before substituting anything. If a demonstration is needed, label its content as fictional. Do not invent customer quotes, rankings, partner logos or product capabilities.
Design direction
Use [BRAND_RULES] and the design system already selected in the project. If no system is supplied, start with this direction: muted lavender, ink typography and apricot accents; thoughtful negative space and a distinctive visual motif. Keep type, spacing and color roles consistent. Prioritize the task over decorative elements and avoid a generic collection of unrelated cards.
Content preparation
Choose the two approaches, shared criteria, values, units and source notes. Decide which differences matter to the intended reader before designing visual emphasis.
Layout and behavior
Align the same criteria across both sides and use equal scales and comparable space. Explain an unknown value in text rather than filling the area with a misleading symbol.
Task-specific acceptance check
- Keep unknown values explicit and avoid a misleading winner label.
- Read each row independently and compare labels with the source.
- Avoid a visual winner created only by color, area or unequal detail when the evidence describes a tradeoff.
Implementation and review
Keep text editable. Use semantic structure, descriptive controls, visible keyboard focus and appropriate empty/error states. Check narrow and wide layouts. Respect reduced-motion preferences. Preserve any existing project framework and dependencies; do not silently replace the stack. Return the editable files and explain any incomplete behavior or unsupported inputs. Review this specific task before proposing extra features.
Keep exact text and required credits as live text. Ask for the intended dimensions when they are missing. Do not invent a functional QR code, barcode, signature or official seal.
Reference attachment and reconstruction goal
Attach reference.webp from this prompt’s download bundle alongside this prompt in OpenDesign. Build an editable result with a similar composition and hierarchy; do not embed the whole reference image as the finished interface. Preserve approved project content and brand rules if they conflict with fictional sample labels. If the image is missing or unreadable, ask for it instead of claiming visual fidelity.
Reference composition and content
Use the attached reference.webp as the visual reference for Comparison Infographic. Before building, identify the major regions from top to bottom, their relative widths and heights, alignment, spacing, typography hierarchy, surface colors, borders, imagery and repeated components. Preserve those relationships rather than substituting a generic template. Required task content: Compare two approaches against consistent criteria using matched visual emphasis. Use the following task-specific layout guidance when translating the image into editable elements: Align the same criteria across both sides and use equal scales and comparable space. Explain an unknown value in text rather than filling the area with a misleading symbol.
Visual direction from the example brief
muted lavender, ink typography and apricot accents; thoughtful negative space and a distinctive visual motif.
Output and editability
Recreate the finished graphic as editable text, shapes and image layers. The reference is a composition, not an editor interface; do not add navigation, forms or dashboard widgets that are absent from it. Align the same criteria across both sides and use equal scales and comparable space. Explain an unknown value in text rather than filling the area with a misleading symbol. Confirm intended dimensions and preserve text hierarchy when adapting the artwork. Keep unknown values explicit and avoid a misleading winner label.
Visual comparison and delivery
- Compare the result with the attached image at matching proportions. Review major region placement, relative image sizes, line breaks, spacing, typography hierarchy, contrast, active states and content density before polishing decorative details.
- Then test the narrow layout without squeezing desktop text into tiny labels.
- Keep logos, photos and icons as separate assets and all meaningful labels editable. List any unavailable fonts/assets and any intentional departures. Return the working files plus a concise account of implemented behavior and remaining integrations; do not promise a pixel-identical result from the prompt alone.
Download Prompt + Image
Includes the complete prompt and full-size reference image. Attach both in OpenDesign to guide the layout.
How to Write a Comparison Infographic Design Prompt
Use this comparison infographic design prompt to compare two approaches against consistent criteria using matched visual emphasis.
The reference is an AI-generated concept. The instructions below describe what to build and test; the image does not demonstrate working behavior.
Give Both Alternatives the Same Visual Basis
A comparison infographic can suggest a winner simply through unequal space or inconsistent units.
The prompt should establish the criteria before selecting a visual treatment. Align the same criteria across both sides and use equal scales and comparable space. Explain an unknown value in text rather than filling the area with a misleading symbol.
From the Prompt
Align the same criteria across both sides and use equal scales and comparable space.
Make It Your Own
Compare [OPTION_A] and [OPTION_B] across [CRITERIA]. Use matching units, label unavailable values and give each option the same row structure and typographic weight.
Prepare the Comparison Infographic Content
The solar column uses repeated symbols for cost, maintenance and other criteria. Supply a defined scale and evidence for each rating rather than treating icon counts as factual measurements.
Choose the two approaches, shared criteria, values, units and source notes. Decide which differences matter to the intended reader before designing visual emphasis.
From the Prompt
Compare two approaches against consistent criteria using matched visual emphasis.
Make It Your Own
For [PROJECT], use [APPROVED_CONTENT] as the source for this comparison infographic. Choose the two approaches, shared criteria, values, units and source notes. Decide which differences matter to the intended reader before designing visual emphasis. Identify missing inputs before replacing them with demonstration content.
Audit the Comparison Logic
A central criteria column aligns the two options. Check that both sides use the same units, scope and period, and retain the demonstration label until supported values are available.
Read across every criterion. If one side uses a measured value and the other a marketing description, fix the evidence before polishing the chart. Read each row independently and compare labels with the source. Avoid a visual winner created only by color, area or unequal detail when the evidence describes a tradeoff.
From the Prompt
Keep unknown values explicit and avoid a misleading winner label.
Make It Your Own
Review the comparison infographic against this requirement: Keep unknown values explicit and avoid a misleading winner label. Read each row independently and compare labels with the source. Avoid a visual winner created only by color, area or unequal detail when the evidence describes a tradeoff. Preserve approved content and revise only the parts that fail this check.
Review Your Comparison Infographic Result
A visual concept is not a press-ready or platform-approved file. Check exact copy, dimensions, color handling, fonts, asset rights and final placement.
- Read each row independently and compare labels with the source. Avoid a visual winner created only by color, area or unequal detail when the evidence describes a tradeoff.
Follow-Up Prompt
Use this after the first result. It narrows the revision to the most important part of this task.
Refine the current comparison infographic. Read each row independently and compare labels with the source. Avoid a visual winner created only by color, area or unequal detail when the evidence describes a tradeoff. Preserve the approved content and visual direction; change only the parts needed to resolve these issues.
