Use the Prompt
Add Your Brief
Add your context below. It will be included with the prompt when you copy or download.
Create an editable HTML presentation with a 16:9 canvas, previous/next buttons, arrow-key navigation, a slide counter and a one-slide-per-page print layout for [PROJECT] and [AUDIENCE]. The task is: Research Findings Presentation.
Required content and structure
Build five slides: research question, method, observation, alternative explanations and recommendation.
Use [APPROVED_CONTENT] as the source of names, dates, figures, claims and destinations. List missing inputs before substituting anything. If a demonstration is needed, label its content as fictional. Do not invent customer quotes, rankings, partner logos or product capabilities.
Design direction
Use [BRAND_RULES] and the design system already selected in the project. If no system is supplied, start with this direction: white, midnight navy and restrained blue; strong alignment and simple evidence diagrams. Keep type, spacing and color roles consistent. Prioritize the task over decorative elements and avoid a generic collection of unrelated cards.
Content preparation
Supply the research question, participant or sample context, method, observations and limitations. Keep direct evidence separate from interpretation and recommendations.
Layout and behavior
Use a five-part argument: question, method, observation, alternative explanation and recommended next step. Give each finding a concrete example rather than only a thematic label.
Task-specific acceptance check
- Keep observation, interpretation and recommendation distinct.
- Trace conclusions back to observations and check sample limitations.
- Avoid turning a small qualitative study into a numerical market claim or treating a recommendation as a tested outcome.
Implementation and review
Keep text editable. Use semantic structure, descriptive controls, visible keyboard focus and appropriate empty/error states. Check narrow and wide layouts. Respect reduced-motion preferences. Preserve any existing project framework and dependencies; do not silently replace the stack. Return the editable files and explain any incomplete behavior or unsupported inputs. Review this specific task before proposing extra features.
Keep one main idea per slide. Use charts only when actual comparable values are supplied; include units, source dates and limitations. Keep speaker notes separate from visible slide content.
Reference attachment and reconstruction goal
Attach reference.webp from this prompt’s download bundle alongside this prompt in OpenDesign. Build an editable result with a similar composition and hierarchy; do not embed the whole reference image as the finished interface. Preserve approved project content and brand rules if they conflict with fictional sample labels. If the image is missing or unreadable, ask for it instead of claiming visual fidelity.
Reference composition and content
Use the attached reference.webp as the visual reference for Research Findings Presentation. Before building, identify the major regions from top to bottom, their relative widths and heights, alignment, spacing, typography hierarchy, surface colors, borders, imagery and repeated components. Preserve those relationships rather than substituting a generic template. Required task content: Build five slides: research question, method, observation, alternative explanations and recommendation. Use the following task-specific layout guidance when translating the image into editable elements: Use a five-part argument: question, method, observation, alternative explanation and recommended next step. Give each finding a concrete example rather than only a thematic label.
Visual direction from the example brief
white, midnight navy and restrained blue; strong alignment and simple evidence diagrams.
Slide structure and presentation behavior
Recreate the slide composition as editable title, body, visual and annotation elements. A pictured slide is one view, not evidence of a complete deck. Use the supplied narrative to build any requested additional slides; preserve its typography, margins, color roles and alignment. Use a five-part argument: question, method, observation, alternative explanation and recommended next step. Give each finding a concrete example rather than only a thematic label. Keep navigation outside exported slide content. Keep observation, interpretation and recommendation distinct.
Visual comparison and delivery
- Compare the result with the attached image at matching proportions. Review major region placement, relative image sizes, line breaks, spacing, typography hierarchy, contrast, active states and content density before polishing decorative details.
- Then test the narrow layout without squeezing desktop text into tiny labels.
- Keep logos, photos and icons as separate assets and all meaningful labels editable. List any unavailable fonts/assets and any intentional departures. Return the working files plus a concise account of implemented behavior and remaining integrations; do not promise a pixel-identical result from the prompt alone.
Adapt the reference to the slide canvas
The attached reference image uses a 3:2 composition. Recompose its editable text, shapes and separate image assets onto the requested 16:9 slide canvas. Preserve hierarchy and readable spacing by adjusting the layout; do not stretch the reference or crop essential content to force it into 16:9. Treat this single concept as a visual direction, not as a completed multi-slide deck.
Download Prompt + Image
Includes the complete prompt and full-size reference image. Attach both in OpenDesign to guide the layout.
How to Write a Research Findings Presentation Design Prompt
Use this research findings presentation design prompt to build five slides: research question, method, observation, alternative explanations and recommendation.
The reference is an AI-generated concept. The instructions below describe what to build and test; the image does not demonstrate working behavior.
Keep Observation and Recommendation Apart
A research findings deck should preserve the path from method to observation to interpretation.
Readers need to see where the evidence ends and a proposed action begins. Use a five-part argument: question, method, observation, alternative explanation and recommended next step. Give each finding a concrete example rather than only a thematic label.
From the Prompt
Use a five-part argument: question, method, observation, alternative explanation and recommended next step.
Make It Your Own
Use five slides: question, method, observation, alternative explanations and recommendation. Include [SAMPLE_AND_LIMITATIONS] and link each recommendation to a specific finding.
Prepare the Research Findings Presentation Content
The title is followed by a specific research purpose; state the study population and question without implying that the cover contains findings.
Supply the research question, participant or sample context, method, observations and limitations. Keep direct evidence separate from interpretation and recommendations.
From the Prompt
Build five slides: research question, method, observation, alternative explanations and recommendation.
Make It Your Own
For [PROJECT], use [APPROVED_CONTENT] as the source for this research findings presentation. Supply the research question, participant or sample context, method, observations and limitations. Keep direct evidence separate from interpretation and recommendations. Identify missing inputs before replacing them with demonstration content.
Challenge the Interpretation
The outline separates observation from interpretation; require supporting evidence and alternative explanations before recommendations.
Ask whether another explanation fits the observation. If it does, acknowledge it and narrow the recommendation to what the evidence can reasonably support. Trace conclusions back to observations and check sample limitations. Avoid turning a small qualitative study into a numerical market claim or treating a recommendation as a tested outcome.
From the Prompt
Keep observation, interpretation and recommendation distinct.
Make It Your Own
Review the research findings presentation against this requirement: Keep observation, interpretation and recommendation distinct. Trace conclusions back to observations and check sample limitations. Avoid turning a small qualitative study into a numerical market claim or treating a recommendation as a tested outcome. Preserve approved content and revise only the parts that fail this check.
Review Your Research Findings Presentation Result
A generated image cannot validate a complete deck or its evidence. Test every slide, keyboard navigation, print layout and any exported file separately.
- Trace conclusions back to observations and check sample limitations. Avoid turning a small qualitative study into a numerical market claim or treating a recommendation as a tested outcome.
Follow-Up Prompt
Use this after the first result. It narrows the revision to the most important part of this task.
Refine the current research findings presentation. Trace conclusions back to observations and check sample limitations. Avoid turning a small qualitative study into a numerical market claim or treating a recommendation as a tested outcome. Preserve the approved content and visual direction; change only the parts needed to resolve these issues.
