The Working Approach
Design Debt Audit surveys the gap between a product's current interface and the standard it should meet. It covers visual inconsistency, outdated structure, accessibility gaps, documentation mismatch and design-related implementation problems. A screen can carry more than one kind of debt, so the audit classifies issues rather than reducing everything to visual polish.
The outcome is a prioritized register and remediation plan. The source uses severity, frequency and effort to identify useful repair work, then separates quick fixes from structural projects and deliberately deferred items. It explicitly treats auditing and remediation as different activities.
Expected Deliverables
- A scoped inventory of screens, states and recurring design problems.
- A debt register with category, severity, affected areas, ownership and status.
- A prioritized plan separating quick wins, structural work and documented deferrals.
From Brief to Review
- 01Define and capture the scope
Choose a product area or platform and catalogue its screens and states. Capture the evidence needed to show where each issue occurs.
- 02Classify and size the debt
Record category, severity, frequency and estimated effort. Distinguish observed occurrence from estimated user reach or business risk.
- 03Prioritize with engineering input
Use the source's severity-by-frequency relative to effort approach to surface a short repair list. Invite engineering judgment where implementation cost is uncertain.
- 04Maintain a living register
Assign owners and target milestones as the team agrees them. Keep deferred items visible and revisit the register as the product changes.